ETHNIC POLARIZATION IN KENYA: LINGUISTIC FEATURES IN POLITICAL NEWS INTERVIEWS
Keywords:
Ethnic Polarization, Kenya, Political news interview, Critical Discourse AnalysisAbstract
Ethnic polarization is a common and growing issue in Kenya due to heightened political contentions surrounding general elections held every five years. A popular media genre employed in political communication is the ‘political interview’ that involves the journalist (as the interviewer) and the politician (as the interviewee). Often, several politicians representing opposing factions are engaged. This article investigates the language of political news interviews in ethnic polarization in Kenya. Critical Discourse Analysis is used to determine the linguistic features of these interviews. Among the key findings of this research is the deployment of ‘naming and referencing’ strategies, mainly done by interlocutors, when describing themselves and their opponents. Similar strategies are widely deployed when foregrounding and/or backgrounding the ‘good traits’ (in-group’s) and the ‘bad traits’ (out-group) as well as the ‘bad’ or ‘good’ characteristics or actions of either faction. The result is aggravated ethnic polarization via the news media.
Downloads
References
Ahearn, L. (2012). Living language: An introduction to linguistic anthropology. USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Baran, S. & Davis, K.D. (2013). Mass communication theory: Foundation, ferment and future. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning
Beard, A. (2000). The Language of Politics. USA: Routledge.
Bell, A. & Garret, P. (2005). Approaches to Media Discourse(6th ED).Oxford: Blackwell.
Cap, P. & Okulska, U.(2013). Analyzing genres in political communication. Theory and practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company
Clayman, J & Heritage, S. (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on Air.Cambrigde: Cambrigde University Press.
Communication Authority of Kenya (2012). Competition Study – the broadcasting industry in Kenya: Dissemination Workshop (Retrieved from www.cak.go.ke on 5/10/2015)
Entman, M. R. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication,43,52.
Ferrari, F. (2007). Metaphor at work in the analysis of political discourse: investigating a ‘preventive war’ persuasion strategy. Discourse and Society, 18(5), 603-625
Fairclough, N.(2003). Discourse Analysis: Textual Analysis for Social Sciences. Great Britain: MPG Books LTD.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fowler, R. (2007). News Discourse and Ideology in the Press. Great Britain: Routledge.
Hutchby, I (2011). Non-neutrality and Argument in the hybrid political interview. Journal of Discourse Studies,13(3), 349-365.
Hutchby, I. (2006). Confrontational Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. NY: Routlegde.
Jorgensen, M. & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Sage.
Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Edward Arnold.
Montgomery, M. (2007).The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. USA:
Mayr, A. (2008). Language and Power: An Introduction to Institutional Discourse. NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Okoth, P.G. & Ogot, B.A (2000). Conflict in Contemporary Africa. Nairobi: Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.
Oyugi, S. (2013). Political Parties in Kenya. Nairobi: Friedrich Stiftung Publications.
Reese, S.; Gandy, O. &Grant, A. (2001). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. London: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Reisgil, M. & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Richardson, J.E. (2007). Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thompson, J.B. (1984). Studies in the Theory of Ideology: USA: University of California Press.
United Nations (2015) Background Information on the Justice and Reconciliation Process in Rwanda. (Retrieved from www.un.org/en/Rwanda, 14/8/2015.)
Van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. London: Sage.
Van Dijk. T. A (1997). .Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Study. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2001). Principles of Discourse Analysis: Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2005). Opinions and Ideologies in the Press in Bell, A and Garrett. Approaches to Media Discourse.USA: Blackwell Publishing Company.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and Power. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
Woolard, K. A. (1998), ‘Language ideology as a field of inquiry’. In K. A. Woolard, B. B. Schieffelin and P. V. Kroskrity (eds), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–47.
