EXAMINING OF PRODUCTION, CONSUMPTION, IMPORTS AND THE EFFECT ON SUGAR SELF-SUFFICIENCY

Authors

  • Andi Sessu Faculty of Economics and Business UHAMKA Jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

self sufficiency, welfare of farmers, PIR, contract farming, cooperative farming

Abstract

One of the problems faced by Indonesia, which lies in the industrial sector of sugar, that sugar production in the country that cannot meet consumption needs, so do imports from several countries. There is a huge opportunity to improve the national sugar production. Increased production of sugar to meet domestic needs have been programmed by the government through sugar self-sufficiency program. At first, self-sufficiency is to be achieved in 2014, but a number of considerations, postponed until 2019. Self-sufficiency has several benefits, among others; (a) increase the income of sugar cane farmers; (b) to be independent from the State (importers); (c) to create new jobs, and; (d) save on the use of foreign exchange. Although self-sufficiency has strategic benefits, but there are some constraints, namely; (a) sugar factories generally are old; (b) the total area of sugarcane plants dwindling; (c) the price of sugar on the world market is relatively cheap, so employers tend to be happy import, and; (d) it is difficult to get adequate land as possible to increase the production of sugar cane, mainly in Java.

The data were analyzed using multiple linear regressions, that the sugar production is positively correlated with the total area of the sugar cane crop, but negatively correlated with the volume of imports. This finding reinforces the self-sufficient, that the national sugar production can be increased through increased production and reduced imports of sugar cane. Another fact, domestic sugar consumption was positively correlated with domestic production and imports. This means that imports of sugar can be omitted if the national production has been able to self-sufficiency. For the success of self-sufficiency program is deemed necessary to improve the governance of the national sugar. In this case there is a choice, continuing the pattern of the core estate and smallholder (PIR), which is already applied, or implementing contract farming or cooperative farming.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonim. (2014). Pabrik Gula di Indonesia. Gain report. Jakarta

Bappenas. (2014). Laporan Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. Jakarta. BAPPENAS

Bappenas. (2015). RPJM. Jakarta. BAPPENAS,

Biro Pusat Statistik. (2015). Statistik Indonesia.Jakarta. Badan Pusat Statistik

Biro Pusat Statistik. (2013). Statistik Tebu Indonesia. Jakarta. Badan Pusat Statistik

Dhillon, Sharanjit S. & Navchetan Singh. (2006). Contract Farming In Punjab An Analysis of Problems, Challenges and Opportunities, Pakistan Economic and Social Review Vol. XLIV (1) 19-38

Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan. (2014). Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia: Komoditas Tebu 2013-2015. Jakarta. Ditjen Perkebunan Kementerian Pertanian R.I.,

Ilham, N., E. Basuno, W. K. Sejati, Ashari, S. Nuryanti, F. B. M. Dabukke, & R. Elizabeth. (2011). Keragaan, Permasalahan Dan Upaya Mendukung Akselerasi Program Swasembada Daging Sapi. Laporan Penelitian PSEKP

Indonesia Sugar Annual Report, (2016) Global Agriculture Information Network (GAIN) GAIN Report Number ID1614

Indrawanto, Chandra., Purwono, Siswanto, M. Syakir & Widi Rumini (2010). Budidaya dan Paspanen Tebu. Jakarta. Penerbit ESKA Media,

Kementerian Perdagangan R.I. (2015). Kebutuhan Gula Nasional, diakses dari situs http://ekbis.sindonews.com/read/985768/34/ kebutuhan-gula-nasional, tgl 17-02-2016

Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan/Bappenas. (2013). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Bidang Pangan dan Pertanian 2015-2019. Jakarta. Bappenas

Kementerian Pertanian R.I. (2015). Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pertanian 2015-2019 Jakarta.Kemenperta

Little, P. & Watts, M. (eds). (1994), Living under Contract: Contract Farming and Agrarian Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.

Menteri Perindustrian dan Perdagangan R.I. (2004).Surat Keputusan Menteri Perindustrian dan Perdagangan R.I. Nomor: 61/MPP/Kep/2/2004 tgl. 17 Pebruari 2004.Kemenprindag, Jakarta

Nuryanti, Sri. (2005). Pemberdayaan Petani dengan Model Cooperative Farming, Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, Bogor, Vol. 3(2) 152-158

Patrick, Ian (2004). Contract farming in Indonesia: Smallholders and AgribusinessWorking Together, ACIAR Technical Reports No. 54, Canberra

Singh, Sukhpal. (2011). Corporate Farming in India:Is it Must for Agricultural Development?, IIMA W.P. No. 2006-11-06

Sugiyanto, Catur. (2007). Permintaan Gula di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan UGM, Vol. 8 (2) 113-127

Surono, Sulastri. (2006). Kebijakan Swasembada Gula di Indonesia, JEPI Vol. VII (1) 65-81

Downloads

Published

30-08-2021

How to Cite

Andi Sessu. (2021). EXAMINING OF PRODUCTION, CONSUMPTION, IMPORTS AND THE EFFECT ON SUGAR SELF-SUFFICIENCY. Researchers World - International Refereed Social Sciences Journal, 7(3), 120–129. Retrieved from https://researchersworld.com/index.php/rworld/article/view/490

Issue

Section

Articles