PERCEPTION OF STUDENTS ON END-OF-COURSE EVALUATION OF PHILIPPINE NORMAL UNIVERSITY – NORTH LUZON CAMPUS

Authors

  • Nicette N. Ganal Philippine Normal University – North Luzon Alicia, Isabela, Philippines.

Keywords:

Evaluation, Course Evaluation, Perception

Abstract

Evaluation is a continuous and collaborative process. Students evaluate the effectiveness of curriculum implementation, they being the heart of education efforts. This study generally dealt on determination and analysis of students’ perception on course evaluation done before the term or semester closes. They composed of 393 sophomore, junior and senior students selected through convenience sampling. Descriptive survey and correlation designs were used. Gathering of data happened during the second semester of school year 2014-2015. 

The study reveals that respondents’ age parallel to their year level, female respondents dominated, BSEd participants prevailed over the BEEd and majority of respondents are junior students. Unanimously, the respondents yielded similar perception on course evaluation regardless of age, sex, and curricular program. They conveyed different perception on course evaluation when grouped according to curriculum year. Age, curricular program and curriculum year relate to the perception of respondents on course evaluation. Sex as a variable is not related to the respondents’ perception on course evaluation. The respondents supported the significance of course evaluation.  They see themselves valuable in providing input to teachers and education leaders to continually improve curriculum implementation because decisions and actions education people do all redound to their holistic development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrami, P.C. (2001). Improving judgments about teaching effectiveness using teacher rating forms. In M. Theall, P.C. Abrami, & L.A.Mets (Eds.),he student ratings debate: Are they valid? How can we best use them? [Specialissue]. New Directions or Institutional Research 109, 59-87.

d’Apollonia, S., & Abrami, P. C. (1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist, 52, 1198-1208.

Aleamoni, L. M. (1999). Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924-1998. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 153-166. Appendix C – Effective Teaching Principles. (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2008 from University of British Columbia Centre for Teaching and Academic Growth Web site: http://www.tag.ubc.ca/ resources/evaluation/appendixc.php Arts Course Evaluations. (n.d.). Retrieved March 1, 2008 from http://evals2.arts.ubc.ca/search.php

Andaya, OJF. et al (2003). Perception of Students on End-of-Course Evaluation of Philippine Normal University, Isabela Campus.

Cashin, W. E. (1990). Students do rate different academic fields differently. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 43, 113-121.

Centra, J.A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Chen, Y., & Hoshower, L. B. (2003). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 71-88.

Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings. Research in Higher Education, 13, 321-341.

Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part II: Evidence from students’ evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education, 34, 151-191.

Fraenkel, J. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.

Franklin, J. (2001). Interpreting the numbers: Using a narrative to help others read student evaluations of your teaching accurately. In K.G. Lewis (Ed.), Techniques and strategies for interpreting student evaluations. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 87, 85-100.

Gredler, M. (1996). Program evaluation. New Jersey, Merrill Prentice Hall.

Gunn, (1996). A framework for situated evaluation of learning in computer environments, Ph.D. thesis, Institute for computer-based learning, Heriot-Watt University.

Franklin, J. (2001). Interpreting the numbers: Using a narrative to help others read student evaluations of your teaching accurately. In K.G. Lewis (Ed.), Techniques and strategies for interpreting student evaluations. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 87, 85-100.

Griffin, G.A. (1999). The education of teachers. Ninety-eight yearbook of the National Society for the study of education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Huston, T.A. (2006). Race and gender bias in higher education: Could faculty course evaluations impede further progress toward parity? Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 4(2): 591-611.

Karisson and Lundberg (2012) on ‘’Rate My Professor’’

Liaw, S.H., & Goh, K.L. (2003). Evidence and control of biases in student evaluations of teaching. International Journal of Educational Management, 17 (1), 37-43.

Marlin, James W. (1978). Students Perception of End-Of-Course Evaluation.

Marsh, H.W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological

issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 253-388.

Marsh, H.W. & Dunkin, M.J. (1992). Students’ evaluation of university teaching: A multidimentional perspective. In J.C. Smart (Ed.). Higher education: Handbook of Theory and Research, New York: Agathon.

Marsh, Herbert W. et al (1979). Validity of student evaluations of instructional effectiveness: A comparison of faculty of self-evaluations and evaluations by their students. Journal of Educational Psychology pp149-160.

Marsh, H.W., & Roche, L (2000). Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students' evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 202-228

McKenna, E. (2000). Business psychology and organizational behavior: A student’shandbook (3rd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.

Merritt, D.J. (2008). Bias, the brain, and student evaluations of teaching, St. John’s Law Review, 82, 235-287.

Murray, H.G. (1987). Acquiring student feedback that improves instruction. In Weimer, M.G. (Ed.), Teaching large classes well [Special issue]. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 32, 85-96.

Wachtel, H. K. (1998) Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 191–210.

Wright, R. E. (2006). Student evaluations of faculty: Concerns raised in the literature, and possible solutions. College Student Journal. 40(2), 417-422.

Wartten, B. (1973). Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Ohio, USA: Jones Publishing Co.

Yeoh, S.F., Ho, J.S.Y. & Chan, B.Y.F. (2012). Student evaluation of lecturer performance among private university students. Canadian Social Science, 8(4), 238-243. Zulueta, Francisco M. Principles and Methods of Teaching. National Book Store, 2007. Manila.

http://mcpsweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Teacher-Evaluation-Performance-Standards-and-Indicators.pdf

https://registrar.uoregon.edu/course-evaluations

http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-927/student.htm

http://www.dom.edu/sites/default/files/documents/acade

Downloads

Published

29-08-2021

How to Cite

Nicette N. Ganal. (2021). PERCEPTION OF STUDENTS ON END-OF-COURSE EVALUATION OF PHILIPPINE NORMAL UNIVERSITY – NORTH LUZON CAMPUS. Researchers World - International Refereed Social Sciences Journal, 7(1), 46–59. Retrieved from https://researchersworld.com/index.php/rworld/article/view/420

Issue

Section

Articles