ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING ISSUES IN MALAYSIA: LEARNERS’ PERCEPTIONS VIA FACEBOOK DIALOGUE JOURNAL
Keywords:
dialogue response journal, language proficiency, language skillsAbstract
The purpose of this research was to gather English as a second language (ESL) learners perceptions pertaining to their experience in learning English language in secondary schools, colleges and local universities. The research methodology incorporated dialogue journal using Facebook. Dialogue journal is a written communication between a teacher and students or other writing partners, which provides a natural context for language development and a new channel of communication outside the classroom. The research incorporated Facebook as it is currently one of the most prominent online social networking sites among Malaysians. 46 respondents from public and private colleges and universities discussed various learning issues including impediments that they encountered during English lessons in secondary school, college and university; learners’ views and comments on the issues pertaining to local English language teaching and learning; and suggestions to improve the teaching and learning of English. The discussion revealed varying viewpoints such as difficulties and reasons that students faced in learning the four language skills i.e. speaking, listening, reading and writing; and the lack of confidence which hampered their language improvement. This research hopes to enlighten educators of arduous challenges that students faced in learning the English language so that they may strive to improve and consolidate their teaching skills, thus, making language teaching and learning more effective and meaningful for both teachers and students.
Downloads
References
Asmah Haji Omar. (1992), “The Linguistic Scenery in Malaysia”, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kuala Lumpur.
Felder, R. M, & Henriques, E. R. (1995), “Learning and Teaching Styles in Foreign and
Second Language education”. Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 21-31.
Godleski, E. S. (1984), “Learning Style Compatibility of Engineering Students and Faculty”, Proceedings, Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 362-364.
Griggs, S. A., & Dunn, R. S. (1984), “Selected Case Studies of the Learning Style Preferences of Gifted Students”, Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol. 28, Issue 3, pp. 115-119.
Hadley, O. A. (1992), “Teaching Language in Context”, Heinle & Heinle. Boston.
Honigsfeld, A., & Dunn, R. (2006), “Learning-Style Characteristics of Adult Learners”, The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, Vol. 72, Issue 2, pp. 14–31.
Krashen, S. D. (1981), “Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning”, Pergamon. Oxford.
Malaysian Examination Council. (2006), “Malaysian University English Test (MUET)”, Kuala Lumpur.
Malaysian Curriuclum Specification. (2003), “Form 4 English Language Curriculum Specifications”, Malaysian Ministry of Education. Kuala Lumpur.
Oxford, R., Ehrman, M., & Lavine, R. (1991), “Style Wars: Teacher-student Style Conflicts in the Language Classroom”. In S. Magnan (Ed.), “Challenges in the 1990’s for College Foreign Language Programs”, Heinle & Heinle. Boston.
Oxford, R. L., Hollaway, M. E., & Horton-Murillo, D. (1992), “Language Learning Styles:
Research and Practical Considerations for Teaching in the Multicultural Tertiary ESL/EFL Classroom”, System, Vol. 20, Issue 4, pp. 439-456.
Peacock, M. (2001), “Match or Mismatch? Learning Styles and Teaching Styles in EFL”,
International Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 1-20.
Smith, L. H., & Renzulli, J. S. (1984), “Learning Style Preferences: A Practical Approach for Classroom Teachers”, Theory into Practice, Vol. 23, pp. 44-50.
Wallace, B., & Oxford, R. L. (1992), “Disparity in Learning Styles and Teaching Styles in the ESL Classroom: Does This Mean War?”, TESOL Journal, Vol. 1, pp. 45-68.
Young, D. J. (1992), “Language Anxiety from the Foreign Language Specialist’s Perceptions: Interviews with Krashen, Omaggio, Hadley, Terrell, and Rardin”, Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 25, pp. 157-172.
Zou, L. (2006), “Teaching in the Light of Learning Styles”, Sino-US English Teaching, Vol. 3, Issue 7, pp. 52-57.
