THE EFFECTS OF CULTURE AND STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY ON POLITICAL SOCIETY BEHAVIOR

Authors

  • Suwarno Social and Politics Faculty of Kadiri University, Indonesia

Keywords:

culture, structure, political behavior, society

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to see the relation between culture and structure on the political society behavior during the elections conducted at Kediri district. The method used is descriptive qualitative. The data was collected using purposive sampling technique by participatory observation and in-depth interviews which were conducted with village heads, society leaders, religious leaders, local academics, religious students, students, administrators society organizations, youth leaders, and ordinary citizens, namely 10 village heads. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded that: 1) each dimension of society culture influences the behavior of different political scenarios. However, the entire dimension of society culture at Kediri has been able to improve the quality of democracy. It happened because of the culture that was developed in Kediri society is more toward rational, modern and humanist; 2) the structure of society influences political behavior of society. The higher the structure is played, more cautious in political behavior should be. This is because, in addition to being the public highlight, it will also affect the meaning of democracy itself. The entire structure of society in politics is basically rational so that it can improve the quality of democracy in Kediri. The researcher only interviewed 10 village heads out of 14 because these 10 village tend to have society conflicts. However, the findings of this research can be also implemented to other village which have the same conflict with them. So it can be concluded that the political behavior can also be implemented to other village who has the same conflict with the 10 villages studied in this research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almond, G. A. & Bingham. G. P, Jr. (1976). Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.

Almond, Gabriel A., & Sidney, V. (1963). Civic Culture (translator: SahatSimamora). Jakarta: BumiAksara

Busro, M. (2015). Traditional Political Behavior. Serang: STIE Banten

Drory, A, T Romm. (1988). Politics in Organization and Its Perception Within The Organization. Organization Studies. 9 (2). pp. 165-179.

Drory, A, T Romm. (1993). Perceived Political Climate and Job Attitudes, Organization Studies, 14, 59-71.

Dubrin, A. J. (2001). Leadership. (3rded) New York: Houghton Mifflin

Evans, A.J. (2004). Voters and Voting: An Introduction. London, California, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945.Florence: European University Institute

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Culture: Selected Essay.New York: Basic Books Inc.

Greenberg, J. & Baron, RA. (2000). Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and Managing The Human Side of Work. New Jersey: Prentice–Hall International, INC

Greenstien, R. G. ed. (1974). The Politics of Future Citizens. San Francisco: Jossey Bass

Han, S-J. 1981. The Failure of Democracy in South Korea. Berkeley et al.: University of California Press.

Jatman, D. (2000). Psikologi Orang Jawa. Semarang: Bentang Budaya

Milbrath, L. W. & Goel, M.L. (1977). Political Participation : How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics?. Chicago: Rand McNally

Munroe, T. (2002). An Introduction to Politics: Lecturesfor First-Year Students-Third Edition. Mona, Jamaica: Canoe Press.

Niemi, R. G. & Herbert F. Weisberg (Eds.). 1973. Probability models of collective decision making. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill

Pomper, G, et al. (1989). The Election of 1988: Reports and Interpretations. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House

Pye, L. W. & Sidney, V. (2015). Political Culture and Political Development.Princeton Legacy Library

Rachmiatie, A. Sidik, A.A. & Kamil, F. (2005). PetaKesadaranPolitik Para Santri di PesantrenKabupaten Bandung MenjelangPemilu 2004.MIMBAR, 21(2), pp. 196-216

Robbins, S. P. & Timothy A. Judge. (2007). PerilakuOrganisasi. Jakarta: PenerbitSalembaEmpat

Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Scott, J. C. (1989). Everyday Forms of Resistance, Copenhagen Papers, 4, pp. 33-62.

Scott, J. C. (1994). Domination and the arts of resistance, Hiddens Transcripts. Yale University Press

Stoker, L. & M. Kent Jennings. (2005). Political Similarity and Influence between Husbands and Wives. In the Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, by Alan S. Zuckerman, 51-74. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Zuckerman, A. S. (2005). Returning to the Social Logic of Political Behavior. In the Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Politicalix Behavior, by Alan S. Zuckerman, 51-74. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

Downloads

Published

25-08-2021

How to Cite

Suwarno. (2021). THE EFFECTS OF CULTURE AND STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY ON POLITICAL SOCIETY BEHAVIOR. Researchers World - International Refereed Social Sciences Journal, 8(4), 66–72. Retrieved from https://researchersworld.com/index.php/rworld/article/view/366

Issue

Section

Articles