INVESTIGATING THE USE OF ACTIVE TEACHING METHODS BY LECTURERS AT THE PHYSICS DEPARTMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GARMIAN
Keywords:
Teaching Methods, Physics, Active, StudentsAbstract
Using active teaching methods is a requirement for educational systems. The goal of the present study is to investigate the use of active teaching methods by lecturers at the physics department of the University of Garmian in the academic year of 2016-2017.
This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out at the physics department of the University of Garmian in the academic year of 2016-2017. The population consisted of all students studying at different levels of physics department (N=174); because of the limited population, the sampling done at that period of time (the census method) and final sample included 145 students. To collect data, a questionnaire was used as prepared by the researcher. Validity and reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed by experts (Cronbach's alpha=0.93). The data collected was analyzed by SPSS 22, using descriptive statistics tests, t-test and one-way ANOVA.
Findings show that more than 56% of students believed their lecturers had used active teaching methods while 43.4% of others believed their lecturers had not used them. Also, results show that there was no significant difference regarding gender (p>0.05), but there was a significant difference between the year of study and evaluating the use of active teaching methods. This difference was significant for the 1st and 4th year students (p<0.05). 4th year students evaluated their lecturers’ methods more active than other students.
Although this study show that most of the lecturers at the physics department used active teaching methods, considering the findings about active teaching methods in different years of study, it can be concluded that lecturers of 1st year students need to use active teaching methods more frequently.
Downloads
References
Andala, H.O. & Ng’umbi, M. (2016). The Teaching Methods Used in Universities in Rwanda and their Effect on the Students’ Academic Performance, World Journal of Educational Research, vol. (3), no. (5), pp. (1-18).
Cahyadi, V. (2004). The effect of interactive engagement teaching on student understanding of introductory physics at the faculty of engineering, University of University of Surabaya, India, Higher Education Research and Development, vol. (23), no. (4), pp. (455-464).
Cortright, R.N., Collins, H.L. & Dicarlo, S.E. (2005). Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: ability to solve novel problems, Advances in Physiology Education, vol. (29), no. (2), pp. (107-111).
Dykstra, D.I., Boyle, C.F. & Monarch, I.A. (1992). ‘Studying conceptual change in learning physics’, Science Education, vol. (76), no. (6), pp. (615-652).
Falconer, K., Wyckoff, S., Joshua, M. & Sawada, D. (2001). Effect of reformed courses in physics and physical science on student conceptual understanding’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Felder, R ., Felder, G. & Dietz , E.j. (1998). A longitudinal study of Engineering student performance and retention. V. Comparisons with traditionally taught student, Journal of Engineering education, vol. (87), no. (4), pp. (469 – 480).
Ganyaupfu, E.M. (2013). Teaching Methods and Students’ Academic Performance, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, vol. (2), no. (9), pp. (29-35).
Khadivi, A. & Mohammadi, F. (2008). The comparison between active and traditional teaching method in science course achievement and the extent of third grader guidance school student’s creativity in Karaj in 1386-87, Journal of Educational Science, vol. (1), no. (2), pp. (95-120).
Lake D.A. (2001). Student performance and perceptions of a lecture-based course compared with the same course utilizing group discussion, Phys Ther, vol. (81), no. (3), pp. (896-902).
Larijani, B. & Motevaseli, E. (2005). New Methods of Medical Ethics Education, Iranian Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism, vol. (4), no. (4), pp. (39-46).
Maker, C.J. (1982). Teaching models in education of the gifted, Austin, Texas, Proed.
Maleki, H. (1385). The realm of curriculum, assessment of the current situation and prospect of drawing, Tehran, Press the side.
Qureshi, M. (2011). Evaluation of using active teaching methods by Physics teachers of the Junior High School and related factors in the city of Karaj in the academic year of 2010-2011, M.A. thesis. Islamic Azad University, Tehran.
Sammons, P. (1995). Complexities in the judgment of school effectiveness, Keynote address presented at the Dutch Educational Research Association Educational Effectiveness Symposium, Groningen, Netherlands.
Teddlie, C. & Reynolds, D. (2000). The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research. London, Falmer Press.
Werf, G. (2005). Learning in Upper Secondary Education. Consuming, Constructing or Engaging?, Inaugural speech, University of Groningen, Groningen: GION.
