ARE PEERLESS E-RESOURCES ANY BETTER TOOLS FOR SUPPORTING STUDENTS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS THAN THE MORE TRADITIONAL TOOLS? THE CASE OF MZUZU UNIVERSITY, MALAWI
Keywords:
F2F, ODL, podcasts, textbooks, Camtasia, MzuniAbstract
E-resources have gradually been introduced and accepted into the academia around the globe over recent years. Accordingly, a variety of novelty learning technologies have been developed to serve students both for open and distance learning (ODL) and Face to Face residential delivery modes (F2F). To serve our ODL Bachelor of Education students well, Mzuzu University decided to develop e-modules, based on blending PowerPoint slides, audio and videos as complementary initiatives to printed-based materials. The aim of this study was to explore students’ perceptions of e-resources as learning tools compared with other more traditional tools used in the 8th, 9th and 10th semester arts, humanities and science courses. The study employed qualitative and quantitative research design and the data were collected using questionnaires, observations and related case-studies. We established that while our anticipation was that modern students would very much prefer e-resources to printed materials, the results came out differently. For example, students in the sciences programme mostly preferred e-resources, lecturers, study-circles and print-based materials but not podcasts and slides. Conversely, students in the arts and humanities mostly preferred print-based materials, lectures and study-circles but not the e-resources, podcasts and slides. The results demonstrated that while e-resources were generally perceived as ideal learning tools against other learning tools, some sections of students based on the programme of study, age and priori experience had serious issues with the e-resources and WhatsApp. We also noted that culture, attitude, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and adaptability were some of the major factors that influenced students’ rate of adoption of novelty technologies such as our peerless e-resources. The paper therefore recommended that e-resources must, at least for now, be used as supplementary materials along with other traditional media.
Downloads
References
Amazon Books Team (2014). Kindle Direct Readers United: Stop Fighting Low Prices and Fair Wages: E-books must be inexpensive. Retrieved on 10 July 2017 from http://www.amazon.com; also available at http://www.readersunited.com.
Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile Technologies and Learning: a Technology Update and M-learning Project Summary. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency. Retrieved on 12 June 2017 from http://www.m-learning.org/docs/the%20 project%20- 20%summary.pdf.
Blakely, G.; Skirton, H.; Cooper, S.; Allum, P. & Nelmes, P. (2009). Educational gaming in the health sciences: systematic review. In Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(2), (pp. 259-269). Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04843.x.
Blevins, A. & Elton, C.W. (2009). An Evaluation of Three Tutorial-creating Software Programs: Camtasia, PowerPoint, and MediaSite. In Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 6(1), (pp. 1-7). Doi: 10.1080/15424060802705095.
Boezman, T (2011). Piracy is good. Retrieved on May 12 2016 from http://www.futurebooks.net/piracy is good
Bradford, M., & Florin, J. (2003). Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4, 205–225.
Bryan, A. (2004) Going Nomadic: Mobile Learning in Higher Education. Educause, 39(5) 28-35.
Burgess, L. (2003). WebCT as an E-learning tool: Study of technology students’ perceptions. In Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), (pp. 6-14).
Caudill, J.G. (2007). The growth of m-learning and the growth of mobile computing: Parallel developments. In International review of research in open and distance learning, 8(8).
Chibambo, M. (2009). How Mobile Phone Technology Can Support ODL in Malawi. The Cambridge International Conference on Open and Distance Learning 2009. The Von Hügel Institute, St Edmund’s College, Cambridge, OUK and COL: Supporting learning in the digital age: Rethinking inclusion, pedagogy and quality Tuesday 22 September - Friday 25 September 2009 Collected Conference Papers and Abstracts September 2009. Accessed from http: www.camcon/ODL/09 10 May 2017.
Chibambo, M. (2014). How Best to Support ODL Students Who Have No Access to Textbooks. MA Thesis. London. Kingston University. Accessed from http:// Wwww.kingstonuniversity.ac.uk on 6 June 2017.
Chibambo, M. (2016). Scurrying for a Successful ODL Model in Malawi: Prevalent Issues and Trends in Distance Education. Journal of Arts, Commerce and Sciences. DOI: 10.18843/rwjasc/v7i4/01. DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.18843/rwjasc/v7i4/01.
Chibambo, M. (2016). Take It or Leave: Agile Business Models in Publishing and Value Addition in the Publishing Sector and forces impacting on these models. Researchers World: Journal of Arts, Commerce and Sciences: Doi:10.18843/rwjasc/v/7i3/01; DOI URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.18843/rwjasc/v7i3/01.
Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. Management Informaion Systems Quarterly, 19, 189-211.
Data Protection Act (1998). Accessed on 12 July 2017 from http://www.holisticdataprotection.com/Backup-Recovery?utm_source=google&int=off&pre=off&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=GAW&utm_content=sy_lp07062017GOOGOTHR_GsidCommvault_MS_DataProtect&utm_campaign=Commvault_DataBackup_Microsite_EMEA&Offer=sy_lp07062017GOOGOTHR_GsidCommvault_MS_DataProtect
Davis, F. (1986). Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems Theory and Results. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Delaney, E.; Pennington, N. & Blankenship, M.B. (2010). The role of podcast lectures in associate degree nursing programs. In Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 5(2), (pp. 54-57). doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2009.08.004.
Douglas, M.; Wilson, J. & Ennis, S. (2012). Multiple-choice question tests: a convenient, flexible and effective learning tool? A case study. In Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(2), (pp. 111-121). Doi: 10.1080/14703297.2012.677596.
Enhanced Higher Education. Kjell Arholms hus: University of Stavenger. Retrieved on 04 June 2017 from http://www.uis.no.
Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50(2), (pp. 491-498). Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.016.
Foss, B., Oftedal, B.F. & Løkken, A. (2009). Rich Media e-Compendiums: A New Tool for Learning.
Foss, B.; Oftedal, B.F. and Løkken, A. (2012). Podcasts of long duration: Supplemental and substitutional learning tools. Paper presented at the EDULEARN12, Barcelona, Spain, 2nd -4th July. 2012.
Gabriel, M.; Campbell, B.; Wiebe, S.; MacDonald, R. J. & McAuley, A. (2012). The role of digital technologies in learning: Expectations of first year university students Canadian. In Journal of Learning and Technology, 38(1).
Galy, E.; Downey, C. & Johnson, J. (2011). The effect of using E-learning tools in online and campus-based classrooms on student performance. In Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, (pp. 209-230).
Harvel, G. & Hardmann, W. (2012). A comparison of different communication tools for distance learning in nuclear education. In Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 6, (pp. 20-33).
Hassanien, A. (2006). An evaluation of the web-quest as a computer-based learning tool. In Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 11(2), (pp. 235-250). Doi: 10.1080/13596740600769230 Information Science Publishing.
Hendrix, J. (2008) ‘Cell-phones as an Instrument for Student Support. The Case of University of Pretoria’: a Report of research findings presented at the DEASA International Conference in Livingston, Zambia. Gaborone, SADC.
Hu, J., Bertol, P., Hamilton, M., White, G., Duff, A., & Cutts, Q. (2006). Wireless interactive teaching by using keypad-based ARS. In D. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 209-221). Hershey, P.A: Information Science Publishing.
Hu, J.-H., Clark, T. H., & Ma, W. W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study. Information & Management, 41, 227-241.
Jancarik, A. & Jancarikova, K. (2010). Wiki Tools in the preparation and support of e Learning courses. In Electronic journal of e-learning, 8(2), (pp. 123-132).
Johnson, J., Galy, E. & Downey, C. (2011). The effect of using e-learning tools in online and campus-based classrooms on student performance. In Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, (pp. 209-230).
Ke, F. (2008). A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? In Computers & Education, 51(4), (pp. 1609-1620).
Kim, S. & Chang, M. (2010). Computer games for the math achievement of diverse students. In Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), (pp. 224-232).
Kuhn, M.A. (1995). Gaming: A technique that adds spice to learning? In Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 26(1), (pp. 35-39).
Laru, J.; Näykki, P. & Järvelä, S. (2012). Supporting small-group learning using multiple Web 2.0 tools: A case study in the higher education context. In The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), (pp. 29-38). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.004.
Lederer, A., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29, 269-282. Retrieved June 19, 2017, from http://www.elsevier.com/locate/dsw.
Lee, J. (2009, July 21). Six key facebook strategies for University and College Administrators. Retrieved January 2017 from http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/6-key-facebook-strategies-for-university-and-college-administrators/225422
Lee, Y., Kozah, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). Technology Acceptance Model: Past, presnt and future. Communication of the Association for Information Systems, 12, Article 50, 752-780.
Librero, F. (2006). Trends in E-learning of Interest to Educators. Paper presented at the National Conference of Phillipines E-learning Society. November, 2006. Quezon, Diliman Publishing, 28-29.
Lopez-Morteo, G. & López, G. (2007). Computer support for learning mathematics: A learning environment based on recreational learning objects. In Computers & Education, 48(4), (pp. 618-641).
Luckin, R.; Clark, W.; Graber, R.; Logan, K.; Mee, A. & Oliver, M. (2009). Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16 year old students. In Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), (pp. 87-104). Doi: 10.1080/17439880902921949
Malawi Government Education Report (2014). Plans and Programmes for the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology: 2009 - 2014 Accessed on 13 July 2017 from https://www.malawi.gov.mw/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24&Itemid=80
Malekata, M. (2012) African Nations Embrace E-learning. Retrieved on 20June 2017 from http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/network-wifi/3361705/african-nations-embrace-e- learning.
Mealer, C.K., Morgan, P.J. &Williams, C.W. (2011). E-readers in Higher Education. The University of Alabama. Retrieved on 14 March 2017from http://bama.ua.edu/~ckmealer/MealerEport/EReaders.pdf.
Michaels, B.J. & Chang, C.W. (2011). Attending a presentation at a distance in real-time via Skype. In Tech Trends, 55(1), (pp. 23-27). Doi: 10.1007/s11528-011-0465-0.
Moore, G., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information tehnology innovation. Information Systems Research, 192-222.
Morris, R. (2014). How to Self-publish Your Book. Keaney. Morris Publishing. Retrieved on 20 February 2017 from http://www.morrispublishing.com/?ref=wwwb.
Mutegi, L. (2014). E-learn Africa Report: Opening a Window on the Continent’s Education Future. Retrieved on 9 June 2017 from http://www.cio.co.ke/news/top-stories/opening-a-window- on-the-continent%E2%80%99%s-education-future.
NEPAD Africa Commission (2003). The NEPAD e-Initiative: Ensuring that young people participate actively in the global information society and knowledge economy. Johannesburg. NEPAD. Retrieved on 22 March 2017 from http://www.eafricacommission.org.
Ostlund, L. E. (1974). Perceived innovation attributes as predictor of innovativeness. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 23-29.
Owens, J.D. & Floyd, D. (2007). E-learning as a tool for knowledge transfer through traditional and independent study at two United Kingdom Higher Educational Institutions: a case study. In E-Learning and Digital Media, 4(2), (pp. 172-180). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/elea.2007.4.2.172.
Oxford University Press ELT. (2016). 25 ideas for using WhatsApp with English language students. Retrieved 5 February 2017 from Oxford University Press: English Language Teaching Global Blog: https://oupeltglobalblog.com/2016/05/17/25-ideas-for-using-whatsapp-with-english-language-students/.
Percival, J.C. & Muirhead, B. (2009). Prioritizing the implementation of e-learning tools to enhance the learning environment. In Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), (pp. 89-106).
Perraton, H.D. (2000). Open and Distance Learning in Developing World. London: Routledge Falmer.
Perrone, A. (2009) E-book collection development in Italy: a Case study. IFLA Journal, 35(4), 305-312.
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C.T. (2004). Nursing research: principles and methods. Philadelphia, Pa.: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. In Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), (pp. 53-64). Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.x.
Sharma, S. K., & Chandel, J. K. (2013). Technology Acceptance Model for the use of learning through websites among students in Oman. International Arab Journal of e-Technology, 3(1), 44-49.
Singh, M. (2010). M-learning: a new approach to learn better. In International Journal of Education and Allied Sciences, 2(2), (pp. 65-72).
The World Bank. (2010). The World Bank Working Paper No. 182. Retrieved May 2017 from the World Bank Group: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/278200-1099079877269/Education_System_Malawi.pdf.
Tornatzky, L., & Klein, K. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-anlysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28-45.
Vasu, M.L. & Ozturk, A.O. (2008). A Rich-Media solution for distance education: A review of MediaSite. In Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), (pp. 528-533). Doi: 10.1177/0894439308317652.
World Health Organisation. (2014). Level of access to IT infrastructure. Retrieved January 2017 from African Health Observatory: http://www.aho.afro.who.int/profiles_information/index.php/Malawi:Level_of_access_to_IT_infrastructure.
Wright, C. (2009). Malawi Instructional Design Report in ODL. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved on 17 May 2017 from http://www.col.org
Zozie, P (2017). Integrating e-learning technologies into conventional teaching and learning in the school and higher education system with scarce resources: a case study of Mzuzu University. PhD Thesis. Scotland. University of Glasgow.
