The Impact of Algorithmic and High-Frequency Trading on Stock Market Volatility: An Empirical Analysis of Global Equity Markets
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: The proliferation of algorithmic trading (AT) and high-frequency trading (HFT) across global equity markets has fundamentally transformed the structure of modern financial markets. This paper examines how AT/HFT intensity influences stock market volatility across major global exchanges — namely the NYSE/Nasdaq (U.S.), London Stock Exchange (UK), Euronext (EU), Japan Exchange Group (JPX), Hong Kong Exchanges (HKEX), and the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) — using high-frequency trade and quote data over the period 2010–2024. We construct multiple HFT intensity proxies including message traffic ratios, order cancellation intensity, and order-flow imbalance (OFI), and pair them with noise-robust realised volatility measures including bipower variation and jump components. To address endogeneity inherent in the AT/HFT–volatility relationship, we exploit discrete, quasi-exogenous regulatory interventions: the SEC's Market Access Rule (Rule 15c3-5), MiFID II's algorithmic trading provisions, and SEBI's successive algorithmic trading and co-location circulars in India. Employing GARCH(1,1) and E-GARCH models in conjunction with panel regressions and event-study difference-in-differences designs, we find that message-traffic-based HFT proxies are negatively associated with realised variance, while cancellation intensity is positively associated with short-term volatility spikes. Leverage effects are identified particularly around the 2020 COVID-driven volatility episode. Regulatory access controls appear to moderate — though not eliminate — HFT's amplification of jump volatility. These findings carry meaningful implications for market design policy, exchange infrastructure governance, and investor risk management across both developed and emerging equity markets.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California's tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746
Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., & Shephard, N. (2006). Econometrics of testing for jumps in financial economics using bipower variation. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 4(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbi022
Black, F. (1976). Studies of stock price volatility changes. Proceedings of the 1976 Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economic Statistics Section, 177–181.
Brogaard, J., Hendershott, T., & Riordan, R. (2014). High-frequency trading and price discovery. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2267–2306. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu032
Christie, A. A. (1982). The stochastic behavior of common stock variances: Value, leverage and interest rate effects. Journal of Financial Economics, 10(4), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(82)90018-6
Cont, R., Kukanov, A., & Stoikov, S. (2014). The price impact of order book events. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 12(1), 47–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbt009
ESMA. (2021). MiFID II review report on algorithmic trading. European Securities and Markets Authority. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma70-156-4572_mifid_ii_final_report_on_algorithmic_trading.pdf
Glosten, L. R., & Milgrom, P. R. (1985). Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90044-3
Hasbrouck, J., & Saar, G. (2013). Low-latency trading. Journal of Financial Markets, 16(4), 646–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2013.05.003
Hendershott, T., Jones, C. M., & Menkveld, A. J. (2011). Does algorithmic trading improve liquidity? The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01624.x
Jordà, Ò. (2005). Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review, 95(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828518
Kyle, A. S. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica, 53(6), 1315–1335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913210
Lee, S. S., & Mykland, P. A. (2008). Jumps in financial markets: A new nonparametric test and jump dynamics. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(6), 2535–2563. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm056
Menkveld, A. J. (2013). High frequency trading and the new market makers. Journal of Financial Markets, 16(4), 712–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2013.06.006
Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260
SEC (U.S.). (2010). Risk management controls for brokers or dealers with market access (Rule 15c3-5; Release No. 34-63241). https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/final/2010/34-63241.pdf
SEBI (India). (2012). Broad guidelines on algorithmic trading (CIR/MRD/DP/09/2012). https://www.sebi.gov.in/legal/circulars/mar-2012/broad-guidelines-on-algorithmic-trading_22471.html
SEBI (India). (2015). Co-location / proximity hosting facility offered by stock exchanges. https://www.sebi.gov.in/legal/circulars/may-2015/co-location-proximity-hosting-facility-offered-by-stock-exchanges_29788.html
SEBI (India). (2018). Measures to strengthen algorithmic trading and co-location / proximity hosting framework (SEBI/HO/MRD/DP/CIR/P/2018/62). https://www.sebi.gov.in/legal/circulars/apr-2018/measures-to-strengthen-algorithmic-trading-and-co-location-proximity-hosting-framework_38605.html
SEBI (India). (2019). Order in the matter of NSE co-location. https://www.sebi.gov.in/enforcement/orders/apr-2019/order-in-the-matter-of-nse-colocation_42880.html
SEBI (India). (2025). Safer participation of retail investors in algorithmic trading (SEBI/HO/MIRSD/MIRSD-PoD/P/CIR/2025/0000013). https://www.sebi.gov.in/legal/circulars/feb-2025/safer-participation-of-retail-investors-in-algorithmic-trading_91614.html
Shleifer, A., & Summers, L. H. (1990). The noise trader approach to finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.4.2.19
Zhang, L., Mykland, P. A., & Aït-Sahalia, Y. (2005). A tale of two time scales: Determining integrated volatility with noisy high-frequency data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(472), 1394–1411. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214505000000169