Scale Development for Measuring Consumer Skepticism towards Online Shopping

Main Article Content

Apoorva Kumar
Pawan Garga

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to develop a scale to measure consumer skepticism towards online shopping decisions (CSTOSD). Shoppers today have strong knowledge and mistrust towards online environment. Consumer skepticism is a complex process because it impacts behavior and decisions. The current study aims to develop a reliable and valid instrument on an ever growing concern for marketers in the form of consumer skepticism. The construct development followed a rigorous and iterative process. The CSTOSD measurement is a 5 dimensional and 20 item scale representing: social risk, suspicion, accord, entrustment and impulsive buying behavior. The results address the gap for non-acceptability, rather than compliance, yielding unique insights into factors of consumer’s skeptical behavior. The scale is helpful to e-commerce marketers by providing them with new foresight into overcoming problems of online shopping decisions.

Article Details

How to Cite
Apoorva Kumar, & Pawan Garga. (2021). Scale Development for Measuring Consumer Skepticism towards Online Shopping. International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS), 6(1(2), 45–54. Retrieved from https://researchersworld.com/index.php/ijms/article/view/1482
Section
Articles

References

Bhatnagar, A, Misra, S., and Rao, H. R. (2000). Online risk, convenience, and Internet shopping behavior, Communications of the ACM, 43(11), 98-105.

Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. M. (1994). Adolescent skepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 165-175.

Boush, D. M., Kim, C. H., Kahle, L. R., & Batra, R. (1993). Cynicism and conformity as correlates of trust in product information sources. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 15(2), 71-79.

Campbell, M. C. (1995). When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3), 225–254.

Churchill Jr., G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.

Foreh, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356.

Forehand, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349-356.

Horton, R. L. (1976). The structure of perceived risk: Some further progress. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 4(4), 694-706.

Hsin Chang, H., & Wen Chen, S. (2008). The impact of online store environment cues on purchase intention: Trust and perceived risk as a mediator. Online Information Review, 32(6), 818–841.

Hunter, J. E., Gerbing, D. W., & Boster, F. J. (1982). Machiavellian beliefs and personality: Construct invalidity of the Machiavellianism dimension. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 43(6), 1293-1305.

Kanter, D. L., & Wortzel, L. H. (1985). Cynicism and alienation as marketing considerations: some new ways to approach the female consumer. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2(1), 5.

Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A. (1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 35-50.

Mitchell, V. W. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33(1/2), 163.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.

Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159-186.

Senecal, S. (2000). Stopping variables in online buying processes: An innovation diffusion approach, Proceedings of the 6th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 1380-1385.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.

Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary. (1990). Springfield, MA: MerriamWebster.

Wright, P. (2002). Marketplace metacognition and social intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 677-682.