Recent Trends in Development of Workplace Policies and Procedure in Leather Goods Manufacturing Companies Chennai

Authors

  • Dr. V. Dhamodharan Head of the Department, Department of Business Administration Govt. Arts College for Men (Autonomous), Nandanam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • V. Agalya Research Scholar, Reg. No: 10390 Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tamil Nadu, India

Keywords:

Workplace policies and procedures, Employee opinion, Employer opinion, leather goods manufacturing company

Abstract

The primary objective of the study is to identify the workplace policies and procedures that are adopted in leather goods manufacturing companies at Chennai. The focal point of the study is to gather data from 50 numbers of employees who belong to various manufacturing and leather export companies in Chennai. The required data is gathered through a set of structured questionnaire. It is analyzed by using simple percentage, t-test, factor analysis and multiple regressionin order to determine the effectiveness of the existing implemented policies and procedure among the employees’ and employers. Based on the findings, the positive and significant relationship with the organization was established. It is found that most of the respondents wereaware of workplace policies andprocedures followed by the company. As far as the small business units are concerned, they frame the policies and proceduresand they arenot completelyfollowed by both employees and employers.  The conclusions, as well as implications, were discussed suitably.

References

Ahluwalia, Isher Judge (1991). Productivity and Growth in Indian Manufacturing, Oxford University Press, Delhi.

Chandrasekhar, C.P. (1988). Aspects of Growth and Structural Change in Indian Industry, Economic and Political Weekly, Special Number, Vol. 23, Nos. 45-47, November, pp. 2359-2370.

Fallon, P and Lucas R. E. B. (1993). Job Security Regulations and the Dynamic Demand for Industrial Labour in India and Zimbabwe, Journal of Development Economics, Vol.40, pp.241-275.

Linda Rhoades and Robert Eisenberger, University of Delaware (2002). Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature, Journal of Applied Psychology Copyright 2002 by the American Psychological Association, Inc, 2002, Vol. 87, No. 4, 698–714, 0021-9010/02/$5.00 DOI: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698

Lowi, Theodore J. (1985). The State in Politics. In Noll, Roger G. (ed.). Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 67–110.

March, James G. and Robert I. Sutton (1997). Organizational performance as a dependent variable, Organization Science 8, 698-706

Panzaru, S. (2009). Comportment organizational, Tipografia University, Spiru Haret, Brasov.

Quinn, James B. (November 1992). The Intelligent Enterprise: A New Paradigm. Academy of Management Executive 6: 48–63.

Raj, K.N. (1986). New Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, Delhi.

Vettriselvan. R, M. Sathya and A. Balakrishnan (December 2014). Human Resource Management Issues in Micro, Small and Medium Enterprisesin Tamil Nadu IRJBM – (www.irjbm.org), Global Wisdom Research Publications, Volume No – VII, Special Issue – 12.

Downloads

Published

30-11-2021

How to Cite

Dr. V. Dhamodharan, & V. Agalya. (2021). Recent Trends in Development of Workplace Policies and Procedure in Leather Goods Manufacturing Companies Chennai. International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS), 5(4(1), 93–98. Retrieved from https://researchersworld.com/index.php/ijms/article/view/2133

Issue

Section

Articles