An Empirical Study on Determinants Affecting the Quality of Management Education

Authors

  • Dr. Pratima Pandey HOD MBA RJS Institute of Management Studies (Affiliated to Bangalore University), Koramangala, India.

Keywords:

Quality, management education, contemporary, stakeholders, outcomes

Abstract

Several developments and changes are happening in our society. Digitalization has thrown so many challenges to our environment, forcing the changes in leadership and management practices. Therefore, management education needs to be updated and developed in order to remain competitive and to ensure good learning outcomes. Management education in India does not match with the global quality standards. The total number of B schools in all categories- University affiliated, Statutory, Autonomous and private may be more in number, but only few of them are providing higher quality management education. Various challenges faced by management institutes are dearth of quality faculty, infrastructure, funding, R& D, quality of students, global competition, admission process etc. The interests of various stakeholders like students, faculty, parents and society at large cannot be ignored. The different determinants of quality of B schools are academic environment; intellectual capital; physical infrastructure; industry interface; placement; stakeholders perception and satisfaction; innovation and pedagogy. This research paper provides an insight regarding the determinants affecting the quality of management education. The need of the hour is to explore new avenues so that the business schools can easily face paradigm shifts.

References

A Chadha, B., Rai, R. S. and Dugar (2013). Globalizing Higher Education in India: Brain Drain in Reverse – A Review, Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management 9 (10), 23 – 33.

Bose, Arundati Sarkar, (2006). Is the Free Market Appropriate for Education? IMPACT, International Journal of Management and Contemporary Thought, pp 66-85.

Brennan, J., & Teichler, U. (2008). The future of higher education and of higher education research. Higher Education.

Briukhanov, V., Kiselev, V., Timchenko, N., & Vdovin, V. (2010). Monitoring the opinions of parents of college students as a component of the institution's In-house education quality management system. Russian Education & Society.

Bowonder, B., Rao, S. L. (2004). Management Education in India: Its evolution and some Contemporary Issues, http://www.aimaind.org/pdf/ Director Conclave_ 9_ Paper. Pdf,

Gupta & Gollakota (2013). Business Policy and Strategic Management: Concepts and Application; Prentice Hill

Harris, J. W., (1992). Key concepts of quality improvement for higher education. In: J.W. Harris & M. Bagget (Eds). Quality Quest in the Academic Process. Stamford University. Birmingham. UK.

Katz, Robert L, (Sep. – Oct.1974). Skills of an Effective Administrator' Harvard Business Review.

Lakhwinder Singh Kang, Surinder Sharma (2012). Managerial Skills and Attitude of MBA and Non-MBA Employees :A Comparison, SAGE Journals.

Menan & Athisayam (2012). Training Needs Assessment: A Study Among Teaching Staff of Management Institutes in Coimbatore City, The Fed Uni Journal of Higher Education.

Mintzberg, Henry, Managerial Work: Analysis from Observation', Management.

Pillai & Garg (2013). Attitudes and Perceptions of Students of Business Schools in Punjab Towards Treatment of Ethics in Marketing; The Fed Uni Journal of Higher Education, Vol. VI, No. 3, pp. 60-81.

Stuart Crainer (1997). Key Management Ideas, Macmillan India Ltd.

Wicks (1992). How People develop, An in-depth look, HR report.

Wicks, (1994). Peer Review and Quality Control in Higher Education, British Journal of Educational Studies, pp 57-68.

Downloads

Published

10-11-2021

How to Cite

Dr. Pratima Pandey. (2021). An Empirical Study on Determinants Affecting the Quality of Management Education. International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS), 5(4(7), 73–79. Retrieved from https://researchersworld.com/index.php/ijms/article/view/1949

Issue

Section

Articles