AN EVALUATION OF CUSTOMER PERCEPTION TOWARDS ALTERNATE BANKING CHANNEL

Authors

  • Jestichan Jose Palakkad, Kerala, India
  • Dr. R. Moses Daniel Principal, Nehru Institute of Information Technology & Management, Thirumalayampalayam, Tamil Nadu, India.

Keywords:

Customer perception, Perceived risk, Psychological risk, Time risk

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the factors which influencing the risk perception of customers while using alternate banking channel. The major findings of this study are, internet banking is having high risk assumed by the majority of the respondents. Based on the risk measurement, financial risk influencing more compared to the other types of risk. Majority of the respondents are assuming that financial risk and psychological risk is more in credit card. Performance risk are more in debit card, time risk, psychological risk, security risk and social risk are huge in internet banking. Financial risk is the mediating factor for determining the perceived risk of the alternate banking customers.

References

Akıncı, Serkan, Aksoy, Şafak and Atılgan, Eda (2004). Adoption of Internet Banking among Sophisticated Consumer Segments in an Advanced Developing Country, The International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol.22, No.3:212-3232.

Cases, Anne-Sophie (2002). Perceived Risk-Reduction Strategies in Internet Shopping, International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 12(4):375-394.

Chen, Tser-yieth and Chang, Hong-Sheng (2005). Reducing Consumers Perceived Risk through Banking Service Quality cues in Taiwan, Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(4): 521-540

Daniel, Elizabeth (1998). Online Banking: Winning the Majority, Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 2(3): 259-270

Flaviàn, Carlos, Guinalìu, Miguel and Torres, Eduardo (2006). How Bricks-and-Mortar Attributes affect Online Banking Adoption, The International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol.24, No.6:406-420.

Laroche, Michael, McDougall, Gordon H. C., Bergeron, Jasmin and Yang, Zhiyong, (2004). Exploring How Intangibility affects Perceived Risk, Journal of Service Research, 6(4):373-389.

Liao, Shaoyi, Shao, Yuan P., Wang, Huaiqinq, Chen, Ada (1999). The Adoption of Virtual Banking: An Empirical Study, International Journal of Information Management, 19:63-74.

Liao, Zigi and Cheung, Michael T. (2002). Internet-based e-banking and Consumer Attitudes: An Empirical Study, Information & Management, 39:283-295.

Suh, Bomil and Han, Ingoo (2002). Effect of Trust on Customer Acceptance of Internet Banking, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1:247-263.

Türkiye Bankalar Birliği, İnternet Bankacılığı İstatistikleri, (2007). http://www.tbb.org.tr/net/donemsel/.

Usta, Resul (2005). Tüketicilerin Internet Bankacılığını Kullanmama Nedenleri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 6(2):279-290.

Walker, Rhett H. and Johnson, Lester W. (2006). Why Consumers Use and Do Not Use Technology- Enabled Services, Journal of Services Marketing, 20(2):125-135.

Yousafzai, ShumailaY., Pallistes, John G. and Foxall, Gordon R (2003). A Proposed Model of e-Trust for Electronic Banking, Technovation, 23:847–860.

Downloads

Published

12-10-2021

How to Cite

Jestichan Jose, & Dr. R. Moses Daniel. (2021). AN EVALUATION OF CUSTOMER PERCEPTION TOWARDS ALTERNATE BANKING CHANNEL. International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS), 4(Spl Issue 4), 102–109. Retrieved from https://researchersworld.com/index.php/ijms/article/view/1472

Issue

Section

Articles