CIVILIZING ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE UNIVERSITY
Keywords:
Entrepreneurship Competencies, CBE2L, Collaboration, New EntrepreneurshipAbstract
Synchronization of policies on employment, business and academia demonstrate a strategic role in building a culture of entrepreneurship both in the form of new entrepreneurs, as well as to the viability of businesses in small and large scale in creating economic value of the nation. Moreover, empirical studies show that the entrepreneurship program has a positive effect on the development of the attributes of individual entrepreneurship, self-reliance, entrepreneurship awareness of career options and instill a positive attitude towards entrepreneurship.
Opportunities offered by Science and Technology Program for Entrepreneurship (IbK) is designed based on competency-based model of entrepreneurial learning and experience (competence base and experience entrepreneurship learning - CBE2L) carried out systematically, challenges and implications for policy makers, universities, entrepreneurs and business types discussed into relevant theoretical perspectives.
CBE2L action-oriented approach implemented through a cycle of conceptualization, experiential learning in the industrial partners, visits and consultations as an effort to facilitate the exchange of information (sharing) to different companies with industry partners previous internships. The success of this model is based on collaboration IbK program manager, Institute of Tourism AMPTA Yogyakarta, industry partners, and the tourism business associations. This model incorporates many theoretical perspectives, challenges, measuring the impact of the implementation of the program IbK with CBE2L models.
The key of implication is pushing IbK program by policies and commitment of institutional resources, sources person who has the knowledge and experience of entrepreneurship and disseminating issues of education involvement in strengthening the culture of entrepreneurship among students.
References
Anderson, A. and Jack, S. (2008). Role typologies for enterprising education professional. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15, 259-273.
Belousova, O, Gailly, B, Basso, O. (2010). An integrative model of corporate entrepreneurial behavior. Journal Research of Entrepreneurship and Small Business. 16, 1-31.
Cope, J. (2005). Towards a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Journal Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 373-397.
Edward, B. and Charles E. (2011). Entrepreneurial Impact. Journal of Economic Trends and Entrepreneurship. 7, 31-49.
Fadzean, E., O’Loughlin, A., Shaw, E. (2005). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation part 1: the missing link. Journal of Innovation Management, 8, 350-372.
Hannon, M., Leitch, C. and Hazlett, A. (2006). Measuring the impact of entrepreneurship education: a cognitive approach to evaluation. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 16, 400-419.
Marvel, M.R. and Lumpkin, G.T. (2007). Technology entrepreneurs’ human capital and its effects on innovation radicalness. Journal of Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 807-827.
Rae, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial learning: a narrative-based conceptual model. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 12, 323 - 335.
Sharma, P. (2013). Entrepreneurship, Economic Growth and Inclusive Entrepreneurship. Journal of Marketing & Management Research. 2, 39-43
Tan, S.S. and Ng, C.K.F. (2006). A problem-based learning approach to entrepreneurship education. Journal of Education and Entrepreneurial Training. 48, 416-428.
Watkins, M, L. (2009). Developing Student Led Entrepreneurship Learning: the Hi-Tech Collaborative Model. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18, 249-274.
