From Literary Discourse to Lecture Note: English Majors Experience in Developing Instructional Material

Douglas Angel A. Aragon II .

Abstract


Purpose: Grounded from the selected short stories, this paper attempts to illustrate how the selected stories establish the colonized sensibility and how these sensibilities share implications in a real life situation. The respondent-informants actual experience in evaluating the merit of literature serves as guide in developing a contextualized instructional material. The challenges they encountered in the process posit the need of developing additional resources in Literary Criticism and Teaching of Literature. Methodology: In understanding the meaning of the text, Homi Bhabha’s postcolonial framework reveals the symptoms of hybridity, multiplicity and abrogation and appropriation of language, which deny possibility of essentialism. On the other hand, in developing the content of the proposed lecture note, this study was guided by Ausubel’s Subsumption, Vygotsky’s Scaffold Learning and Dewey’s Constructivist Approach. These theorists argued that an advance organizer is a form of scaffold that supports the teaching and learning process. Lastly, the packaging of the lecture note follows the principles cited by Ruscoe (2006) for the design and organization and Johnson (1975) for the steps and processes. Findings: This study surveyed three groups of respondent-informants from the CBSUA-Sipocot Campus. The first group was composed of 100 English majors used as respondents for the need assessment on the need of developing instructional materials in the two areas. There were 57 freshmen, 33 sophomore and 10 juniors. These respondents determined that “learning is best achieved in the presence of sample output exercises reflected in the handouts” with an interpretation of strongly agree. For clientele satisfaction along the performance of this researcher in conducting the study, the respondents were composed of 10 faculty members and 16 English majors argued that “research result would address client’s need” interpreted outstanding. The third group of respondents evaluated the content validity of the lecture notes. These respondents were composed of the three faculty-experts in the field that validated the content of the two instructional materials. The IM was evaluated on content, organization, effectivity and preference. Both lecture notes received a very satisfactory rating, recommended for utilization. Implication: The study implies that developing an instructional material based from the experiences by the students in the classroom setting provides a contextualized lecture notes – an IM which is friendlier to the students. Moreover, this study proves that teacher’s mentoring is still indispensable because of developing competency of the students in evaluating the merit of literature. At the end of this attempt, this paper hoped that it may open a series of literary studies to other perspectives and thereby develop instructional materials generated from the exercises made by the students to serve as additional reference in appreciating literature and literary criticism particularly for a student-directed group environment. Originality: Finally, available literature in content development of instructional materials through contextualized instruction and process is limited and similar undertakings in this field of study is relatively inadequate.


Keywords


lecture note, contextualized instructional material, colonized sensibility

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aragon, D. (2017). The bikolano sensibility in merlinda bobis’s’ white turtle in Researchers World: Journal of Arts, Science and Commerce, 8(1).

Ausubel, D. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune & Stratton. Retrieved from https://icebreakerideas.com

Bhabha, H. (1994). The Location of Culture, London: Routledge.

Brucal, JW., Quilaton, AK., Tampucao, J. & Mandigma, E. (2018). Instructional materials in teaching literature in the unified schools of the archdiocese of lipa in, International Journal of Recent Innovations in Academic Research.

Caringal, J. (2014). Instructional materials in english 100 towards grammatical competence. Unpublished Thesis, Batangas State University in Retrieved from www.ijriar.com.

Derbel, E. (2019). Teaching literature through comics: An innovative pedagogical tool in International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. AIAC.

Dewey, J. (1933). Constructivist approach. Retrieved from https://education.stateuniversity.com

Doerr, N. (2017). Learning as othering: Narratives of learning, construction of difference and discourse of immersion in study abroad, Intercultural Education 28. Retrieved from https://tardfonline.com

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. In Menggo, S., Suastra, IM., Budiarsa, M., & Padmawedi, NN. (2019). Needs analysis of academic-english speaking materials in promoting 21st century skills. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 739-754. https://doi.org. Retrieved from https://www.e-iji.net

Janse, B. (2019). John dewey theory. Retrieved from https://www.toolshero.com

Mandigma, S. (2014). The assessment of instructional materials in teaching national science 102: Basis for preparation of of modules. Graduate Thesis, Batangas Stae University in Retrieved from www.ijriar.com.

Marasigan, N. (2019). Development and validation of a self-instructional material on selected topics in analytic geometry integrating electronic concepts in International Journal of Recent Innovations in Academic Research.

Rogayan, D. (2018). Development and validation of physical science workbook for senior high school in Science Education International, 30(4).

Ruscoe, R. (2006). Seminar-workshop on instructional materials preparation and book writing, 12-13, Partido State University.

Virkama, A. (2007). From othering to understanding: Perceiving culture in intercultural communication, education and learning. TamPub Uta: University of Tampere. Retrieved from https://trepo.tuni.fi.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office:

Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,
S.N. 21, Plot No 24, Mirza Ghalib Road Malegaon Nasik,
Maharashtra India - 423203.
+919764558895 (WhatsApp),
editor@researchersworld.com, http://researchersworld.com/

Copyrights © 2010-2020 - ERM Publications, India     

This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/